On the threshold conditions for electron beam damage of asbestos amosite fibers in the transmission electron microscope (TEM)
Type de document
Études primaires
Année de publication
2016
Langue
Anglais
Titre de la revue
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Première page
924
Dernière page
935
Résumé
Asbestos amosite fibers were investigated to evaluate the damage caused by a transmission electron microscope (TEM) electron beam. Since elemental x-ray intensity ratios obtained by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) are commonly used for asbestos identification, the impact of beam damage on these ratios was evaluated. It was determined that the magnesium/silicon ratio best represented the damage caused to the fiber. Various tests showed that most fibers have a current density threshold above which the chemical composition of the fiber is modified. The value of this threshold current density varied depending on the fiber, regardless of fiber diameter, and in some cases could not be determined. The existence of a threshold electron dose was also demonstrated. This value was dependent on the current density used and can be increased by providing a recovery period between exposures to the electron beam. This study also established that the electron beam current is directly related to the damage rate above a current density of 165 A/cm2. The large number of different results obtained suggest, that in order to ensure that the amosite fibers are not damaged, analysis should be conducted below a current density of 100 A/cm2.
Mots-clés
Fibre minérale, Mineral fibre, Amiante, Asbestos, CAS 1332214, Amiante Amosite, Asbestos amosite, CAS 12172735, Faisceau d'électrons, Electron beam, Valeur-seuil, Threshold limit value, Siliciure de magnesium, Magnesium silicide, 22831396
Numéro de projet IRSST
n/a
Citation recommandée
Martin, J., Beauparlant, M., Sauvé, S. et L'Espérance, G. (2016). On the threshold conditions for electron beam damage of asbestos amosite fibers in the transmission electron microscope (TEM). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 13(12), 924-935. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1191638
