Field sampling of indoor bioaerosols
Type de document
Revues de littérature, synthèses de connaissances
Année de publication
2020
Langue
Anglais
Titre de la revue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Première page
572
Dernière page
584
Résumé
Because bioaerosols are related to adverse health effects in exposed humans and indoor environments represent a unique framework of exposure, concerns about indoor bioaerosols have risen over recent years. One of the major issues in indoor bioaerosol research is the lack of standardization in the methodology, from air sampling strategies and sample treatment to the analytical methods applied. The main characteristics to consider in the choice of indoor sampling methods for bioaerosols are the sampler performance, the representativeness of the sampling, and the concordance with the analytical methods to be used. The selection of bioaerosol collection methods is directly dependent on the analytical methods, which are chosen to answer specific questions raised while designing a study for exposure assessment. In this review, the authors present current practices in the analytical methods and the sampling strategies, with specificity for each type of microbe (fungi, bacteria, archaea and viruses). In addition, common problems and errors to be avoided are discussed. Based on this work, recommendations are made for future efforts towards the development of viable bioaerosol samplers, standards for bioaerosol exposure limits, and making association studies to optimize the use of the big data provided by high-throughput sequencing methods. Copyright © 2020 American Association for Aerosol Research. © 2019, © 2019 American Association for Aerosol Research.
Mots-clés
Échantillonnage et analyse, Sampling and analysis, Échantillonnage dans l'air, Air sampling, Air intérieur, Indoor air, Aérosol, Aerosol, Microorganisme
Numéro de projet IRSST
n/a
Citation recommandée
Cox, J., Mbareche, H., Lindsley, W. G. et Duchaine, C. (2020). Field sampling of indoor bioaerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 54(5), 572-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1688759

- Citations
- Citation Indexes: 68
- Policy Citations: 4
- Usage
- Abstract Views: 2
- Captures
- Readers: 178